Managing the Productivity and Costs of the Employee Job Life Cycle
Provided by Greg Borton, CEO, Primary Matters
October 1, 2004
Implementing Workforce Scheduling & Management may increase your labor productivity 5% to 10%. Creating a business process for Quality Monitoring may increase productivity 5% - 8% with increases in customer satisfaction.
However, if you have high employee turnover and an extensive learning curve, creating a management environment to increase employee job duration based on new hiring strategies, reward & recognition programs and other labor retention tactics can increase your productivity by 10% to 30% while simultaneously increasing quality. What is of great interest is that the cost of managing towards longer Employee Job Life Cycles is significantly less than many other options.
The data and conclusions in this White Paper are based on Primary Matters' work and analysis at large companies.
The VP of a large division is meeting with the management group . . .
At this point in the meeting, the VP of Human Resources looks up,
If you have implemented the management and quality programs mentioned above, you are an unusually good business operation. However, the conversation above shows that this group does not have the information to understand or manage the Job Life Cycle of their workforce. In fact, if one visits a number of large organizations, it will quickly be found that few large operations track this Job Life Cycle. In some cases this may not be important since simply knowing the attributes of the life cycle will not provide useful information for meeting the group’s goals. But in cases where there is a significant new employee learning curve and moderate to high job turnover, managing this life cycle may be one of the most effective ways of meeting business goals.
What is the Employee Job Life Cycle?
The Employee Job Life Cycle describes the evolving quality, productivity and job retention of typical employees throughout the process of hiring, employment and termination. It picks out the most important performance data and measures it carefully for each of the different time periods in typical employees’ time with a company.
The following chart illustrates the high points of an Employee Job Life Cycle. Here, six different stages – Job Duration Groups - have been chosen. Each stage has a different set of attributes which are:
(NOTE: Greater than half of the employees are in the 0 to 6 month category.)
The organization portrayed in this chart obviously has a problem - high turnover. In the first 4 weeks, 22% of the new hires leave. Almost 50% leave by the end of 16 weeks and 85% of the workforce stays less than one year.
This chart shows the ‘lopsided’ nature of this workforce. As can be seen, most of the employees are in the Entry Level Production stage of their Employee Life Cycle. They do not reach full productivity until the next stage. As will be seen later in the paper, there is a very high cost associated with such a profile. One would also be surprised to find out how often this profile occurs.
Do you have too many low productivity personnel, due to their place in the employee life cycle?
It turns out that a number of organizations have high employee turnover in operations such as customer contact centers, back-office processing and inventory management positions.
Health care, communications, banking and insurance are more prone to these high turnover characteristics than other industries. The reasons are multifold, but in general, the environment in which these organizations perform forces them into these employee patterns. The characteristics of their environment are:
This table provides a few questions that will predict whether you are ripe for harvesting some of the goals mentioned in the above list.
Opportunities for improvement
If you meet many of the above criteria, then you have significant opportunities to improve productivity, quality and reduce the stress on your management by pursuing programs that reduce employee turnover. In particular:
In fact, the opportunities for improving performance are as high, if not higher, from managing the Job Duration Life Cycle as they are from implementing a number of other technology and business process opportunities.
The costs of doing work across Employee Life Cycle demographics
The next chart, although showing data that is somewhat exaggerated, provides information about an example customer contact center for each different job life cycle group. The data is derived from several large companies who meet the profiles described in the text above. They all have complex learning curves and high job turnover.
First, for these customer contact centers, the variation in calls handled per hour is wide. In the Early Training it is 4 calls per hour. This is because most new calls are new experiences, each call requiring careful learning and often, questions to supervisors. Call handling increases to 6 per hour during the Apprenticeship and 8 when an employee moves into the Early Production stage. Not until the employee has finished their 6 th month, when they move into the 100% Productive Category, do they reach full productivity of 10 calls handled per hour.
Of equal importance is the Error Rate analysis. It is no surprise that during the Early On-the-Job Training and Apprenticeship stages that there are many of errors (upwards of 50% and more calls are handled with some problem). This declines to 25% in the “Early Production” stage, and reaches a better 85% to 90% correct handling rate only after the Agent has been working for 6 months.
These errors are very, very expensive. The cost of solving a customer issue when there is a mistake made during a call is often double or triple the cost of an error-free call.
The following chart shows the ‘cost-per-call’ and the ‘cost-per-customer-issue-solved’ for each of the Employee Life Cycle Groups in a customer contact center, based on the data above. Note that these costs are calculated based on both the longer durations for new employees and their higher error rates, which causes additional work to be done.
Note that in our example (see first table in this White Paper), more than half of the employees are in the “Less than 6 Months” employment category. This means that more than half the overall employees are at the lower productivity rates and higher error rates. This should be of major concern to management. Currently, it is the unusual group that receives reports, by each Employee Life Cycle Group, that enables them to understand and manage this process.
There also is another, cultural issue. It is often observed that, in a high turnover environment, the management team feels somewhat ‘powerless’ to confront and solve the high employee turnover. So it becomes accepted as a ‘de facto’ state. They turn their focus to other issues which can be solved more easily. In fact, this business problem can be addressed just as successfully as many other problems, often with a more significant positive impact on business performance than other options provide.
A 10 to 15 Week increase in the Average Job Duration has a massive impact on budgets
This table provides a Baseline (where an organization is now) and a Scenario (where an organization could be) based on increasing the Average Job Duration by roughly 10 weeks.
By comparing the Agent populations in each of the Groups, and the calls handled by each group, one quickly sees that by simply increasing the job duration 10 to 15 weeks there are major changes in the productivity of the organization. This is due to the fact that in the Baseline, most employees and work is handled in the ‘less than 6 months’ groups, which have lower productivity and higher error rates.
By aging the employee population, the majority of the employees are now in the greater than 6 months category; thus, reaching significantly higher productivity levels and lower error rates. This ‘movement of the bulge’ is shown in the following graph. The Baseline, in the darker blue, shows the peak employees in “Full Production”, which is roughly comprised of those who are between 4 and 6 months of employ. Under the Scenario, in the lighter pink, the bulk of the employees are in the last two categories which consist of personnel who have been on the job more than six months.
The opportunity costs are immense. The annual budgets of the Baseline and the Scenario are also shown on the table. As one can see, the Baseline budget is $39 million per year, whereas the Scenario is showing a budget of only $28 million per year – a 28% productivity improvement. This may be a bit higher than the opportunity available to some organizations, but not by much. Due to the double impact of reduced hiring, higher productivity and fewer errors, there will be a significant impact even with a several week increase in the average job duration.
A required success factor – monitoring and managing the evolution of the employee workforce
In order to manage the employee workforce, it is important that the management group has a structured business process and the tools for monitoring and managing the evolution of its workforce. This can only be accomplished by having information that identifies, in a consistent manner across all major sites, the employees’ attributes in each job duration group. The data should include:
Capturing, analyzing and providing monthly reports on the Employee Agent work force correctly and consistently, with scheduled monthly updates, will enable a Management Group to manage the trends in its labor pool. A company will be able to identify the productivity opportunities, qualify the business impact and value of project initiatives, and be able to measure the changes in the Agent Demographics, productivity, and costs as various initiatives are implemented.
What programs are effective at increasing the Employee Job Duration?
The goal of a strategy to increase average job life cycles is to make the business a fun place to work, in which most employees have no desire to go anywhere else. Over time, this means that good employees stay, that there is a large pool of prospective employees who want to join, and there is a low attrition rate.
As has been shown above, the pay-off is very high. Programs that are typically most effective include:
For those large operations which have high turnover and a long learning curve, there are opportunities to reduce employee budgets by 10% to 30% by increasing the average Employee Job Duration an average of 10 to 15 weeks.
There is usually a vast amount of data available to Human Resources and Management about hiring, retention, and job performance, but little of it:
In order to manage towards the goal of job retention, it is necessary for an organization to have a formal business process with continuously updating reports and Key Performance Indicators and informing management about the workforce. This requires:
More importantly, by successfully implementing the programs to reap the productivity opportunities, it will also reap significant increases in the quality of its work product and its customers’ satisfaction. A general relationship is that productivity opportunities are almost always directly linked to quality improvements. This will lead to more ongoing business from current customers as well as provide it the track record to continue its growth with new customers.
Primary Matters and its Services
Primary Matters specializes in creating the business processes, providing the software tools and/or the outsourced services that give management the reports and Key Performance Indicators enabling companies to manage the evolution of their workforce. Our customers receive accurate information on which they can make decisions. They are then able to track and manage the progress and results of their initiatives; thus, ensuring that they achieve the desired business goals.
The company excels in measuring and forecasting organization’s budgets, establishing capacity planning business processes and providing a detailed focus on revealing the costs, productivity and attributes of the employee workforce. The company uses its software and services to provide a range of Key Performance Indicators to management.
Primary Matters’s experience and software also is designed for estimating and measuring the business impact of various initiatives, whether they consist of changing personnel strategies, business process re-engineering, or the introduction of technology, such as converged networks or Voice over IP.
When working with Primary Matters, a management group will understand, in detail, the behavior of its organization and measure the benefits of its tactics and strategies to improve productivity and quality.
These benefits are accomplished via a combination of Primary Matters’s practice expertise, its Outsourced Services and use of its software tools, the core of which is The Primary Matters Guide, an Activity-based, Business Analytics and Capacity Planning solution.
The Primary Matters Guide®
The Guide (www.primarymatters.com) the foundation of the business analytics provided by Primary Matters. It is asoftware product and solution that is a powerful activity-based integration planning and budgeting tool. When deployed to create budgets and resource requirements, or used as a diagnostic probe, a change management counselor, or a forward-looking planning tool, The Guide is the foundation for providing the business analytics and extensive reports used to support strategic goals and plays an important role in the management of organizations.
The Guide is a sophisticated planning tool. Yet it addresses the biggest problems with tools of this nature--that of complexity, long time to benefit, high expense, and lengthy training requirements. It has been designed so that the user focuses only on the factors that will make a material difference to The Guides' results and its ability to support critical business decisions. Many organizations who decide to acquire and use The Guide themselves receive formal training and, literally, within three to five days, are obtaining significant business benefits from the environment.